Talk:Zmud Damage Counter
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Heh. Looks nice. With the help of Ttak, this has been upgraded! It now also counts spell damage (for significant spells). Changed code would be:
#TRIGGER {^(%w)[^>;]{strike|strikes|hits|blast|blasts|pierce|smash|backstab|bash|maelstrom|Meteor Swarm|acid rain|disintegrate|brimstone|cataclysm|ultrablast|field of death} (%w)[^>;]with([* ])(%w)[* ]%w[!.]} {#IF {%ismember( %lower( %1), @DClist)} {#VAR %lower( %1) %replaceitem( %eval( %item( @damagevalues, %ismember( %concat( %4, %3), @damageverbs))+%item( @{%lower( %1)}, 17)), 17, @{%lower( %1)});#VAR %lower( %1) %replaceitem( %eval( %item( @{%lower( %1)}, %eval( %ismember( %lower( %4), @damageverbshort)+1))+1) , %eval( %ismember( %lower( %4), @damageverbshort)+1) , @{%lower( %1)})};#IF {%ismember( %lower( %2), @DClist)} {#VAR %lower( %2) %replaceitem( %eval( %item( @damagevalues, %ismember( %concat( %4, %3), @damageverbs))+%item( @{%lower( %2)}, 18)), 18, @{%lower( %2)})};#IF {%lower( %2) = "you"} {#VAR %lower( your) %replaceitem( %eval( %item( @damagevalues, %ismember( %concat( %4, %3), @damageverbs))+%item( @{%lower( your)}, 18)), 18, @{%lower( your)})};#IF {%lower( %1) = "you"} {#VAR %lower( your) %replaceitem( %eval( %item( @damagevalues, %ismember( %concat( %4, %3), @damageverbs))+%item( @{%lower( your)}, 17)), 17, @{%lower( your)});#VAR %lower( your) %replaceitem( %eval( %item( @{%lower( your)}, %eval( %ismember( %lower( %4), @damageverbshort)+1))+1) , %eval( %ismember( %lower( %4), @damageverbshort)+1) , @{%lower( your)})}}
Basically, another #IF is added that checks when %1 is "you" and adds the numbers to the right vars, so that it can handle the new types of damage. Not sure if it will get messed up with the spaces and the uppercase, but I don't have any of those spells to test it with... --Llanor 01:08, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
- FYI, this line comes instead of the first #TRIGGER line that's in the article. --Llanor 05:47, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
Month late but I was under the impression that it would catch some (most?) spells already, don't have a mage though so if this works better alls good :) - Everman (10/27/07)