Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Sorcerers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I moved the discussion about double remorts to the "remort" section rather than creation. Seemed more appropriate there. | I moved the discussion about double remorts to the "remort" section rather than creation. Seemed more appropriate there. | ||
| − | Tuataurs are a bad choice for sor remort? on what evidence? apart from no arcane bonus I can't see why tua are not a viable sor remort? --[[User:Redwinter|Redwinter]] 19:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | + | Tuataurs are a bad choice for sor remort? on what evidence? apart from no arcane bonus I can't see why tua are not a viable sor remort? yeah I know Im biased but explain --[[User:Redwinter|Redwinter]] 19:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | I'd say that statement is wrong. Updating the article. --[[User:Morgul|Morgul]] 20:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'll yield to your experiences. I haven't played a Tua, and what I had originally heard was they were great for Psi-based classes, but not for casters. Sorry for jumping in line out of turn ;) --[[User:Shalineth|Shalineth]] 21:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:09, 17 November 2008
I moved the discussion about double remorts to the "remort" section rather than creation. Seemed more appropriate there.
Tuataurs are a bad choice for sor remort? on what evidence? apart from no arcane bonus I can't see why tua are not a viable sor remort? yeah I know Im biased but explain --Redwinter 19:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
I'd say that statement is wrong. Updating the article. --Morgul 20:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
I'll yield to your experiences. I haven't played a Tua, and what I had originally heard was they were great for Psi-based classes, but not for casters. Sorry for jumping in line out of turn ;) --Shalineth 21:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
